TipHero - Your Guide to Saving Money   Tip Hero serves up fresh money-saving tips daily,
with over 1,700 tips shared by readers to date.
 
  GET FREE UPDATES:

 
Tips by Category:
 
COMPARE PRICES
ON TRAVEL
Search Over 40 Websites for Cheap Airfares and More
 
ECO-FRIENDLY
DEALS & GIVEAWAYS
Get the Latest Offers Sent to Your Inbox Weekly for Free
 
 
Insurance & Legal
Home > Insurance & Legal > Topics:  Property Insurance
-----------------------------------------
Is Renters Insurance Worth it?

Submitted by: Ray @ Tip Hero  09/16/2009 5:56 PM
 
I've never purchased renters insurance. I've always been unclear as to what exactly it covers, as well as under the impression that the costs would be rather steep. In a recent column by Kimberly Palmer of US News & World Report, Why Renters Insurance Is Worth Its (Low) Cost, Ms. Palmer highlights a study by Allstate Insurance that reports that two out of three renters choose to go without renters insurance. The study points out that nearly one in three survey respondents thought renters insurance would cost more than 15 times the actual cost.

The article goes on to discuss why renters are more at risk than homeowners when it comes to theft of property. "Renters, in fact, are more at risk than homeowners. The Bureau of Justice Statistics reports that renters are 50 percent more likely to experience theft than those who own their homes."

What does renters insurance cover? The two main components of renters insurance protection are: (1) property -- protection against theft and destruction of personal property like TV's, computers, etc., and (2) liability -- which protects you from judgments that go against you in the event someone is injured on your property. Many renters insurance policies also include temporary relocation expenses, such as the cost of a hotel, for example, should your apartment building burn down. Rental insurance coverage varies from insurer to insurer and policy to policy so it's important to be absolutely clear on what your coverage contains.

Depending on your deductable and coverage amounts, you can expect to pay around $100-$200 per year for renters insurance.
---
sponsored: Find More Frugal Ideas & Money Saving Tips.
---
Tip Hero serves up new money-saving tips daily.
Get free updates via Email , RSS or Twitter.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Comments:
 
.................................
 
My brother lost everything in a house fire many years ago. Because he did not have renter's insurance, he had to purchase everything out of pocket; it took him years to financially recover from that. In addition, I think that many rental contracts now require you to carry so much in personal property and liability. There are so many other ways to cut costs -- this just doesn't seem to be one of them!!
 
Posted by anonymous on September 17, 2009 5:12 PM
.................................
 
Renters insurance is well worth the cost over losing everything you own. Plus, if you have auto insurance alot of Insurance companies give a multi policy discount,the savings off your auto insurance pretty much covers the cost of the renters insurance. In some cases your auto insurance is alot cheaper, so it is a no brainer to have renters insurance too. You get the multi policy discount on both products.
I work for an insurance company and we always try to save our clients money and multi policy credits are a big savings.
 
Posted by Susie on September 17, 2009 8:55 PM
.................................
 
Well, I'm going to go out on a limb here and say "It depends." When I was a renter I owned little more than an old computer, a cheap stereo, and an "entertainment center" that was worth maybe three hundred bucks. That and, of course, my thrift store clothes and a few pots and pans. I rather doubt that the sum-total of what I owned was worth more than a few hundred dollars. I really didn't think at the time that it was worth spending, as I recall, about twenty bucks a month (probably higher now) to insure my stuff. Of course, if you own things that are valuable--you might feel differently. My philosophy is: Don't insure what you can afford to replace.
 
Posted by Yacman on September 17, 2009 10:33 PM
.................................
 
It is worth checking in to. Our policy costs us about $10/mo, and covers about $20,000 replacement goods, which isn't much when you consider clothes and shoes alone. Of course, my husband and I are very tall and it's hard to find clothes that fit properly--especially at thrift stores, and the goods we've accumulated over the years we've lived on our own...even though much of it was given to us, to replace it would cost a lot of money. it's good to have some help in that regard.
 
Posted by heather on September 18, 2009 10:42 AM
.................................
 
Something to add, as well. We got my engagement ring insured (the stone was handed down to us and worth quite a lot). We were told that we couldn't insure just the ring, as jewelery insurance has to "ride" on another insurance policy. We purchased renters insurance and insured my engagement and wedding rings as a rider on that. I think it costs us a total of a few hundred bucks a year, but completely worth it to insure something I wear every day (I'm not delicate with my jewelery, either!) and our apartment, which filled up with decent things after the wedding! We have the renters insurance with the same company as our auto insurance, which got us a break, as well.
 
Posted by Kate on September 18, 2009 3:11 PM
.................................
 
My apartment was broken into and I was able to claim some of the jewelry that my wife had stolen because we had renter's insurance. The cost is so low but if something happens that leads to you to have a make a claim at least you have it.
Jerry
 
Posted by Jerry on October 02, 2009 4:18 PM
.................................
 
-----------------------------------------
Share Your Comments:
 
Comments may need to be approved before they are displayed.
 
Comments:
Name (leave blank if you want to be anonymous):
Email Address (your email address will not be displayed):
Website URL (not required; please do not include "http://"):